|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Pro TIps
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
22
|
Posted - 2014.09.11 04:39:00 -
[1] - Quote
Asayanami Dei wrote:Bookmark improvements - great! Not much else to say here. Did you actually try this out at all? Do you routinely copy bookmarks for other corps in your alliance? Did you ask CCP what the rate-limit was before and what it is now; or how much more quickly corp bookmarks are (supposed to) update?
I don't think you did any of those things. I would like answers to the above questions.
You can now copy five bookmarks at a time to your cargo. It was four. The interval between copy operations is still lengthy, and updates still take significant time to propagate to corpmates.
In other words, you're full of ****. Stop cheerleading what you think is an obviously good change that in fact wasn't. Was it bad? No. But it wasn't nearly enough.
The reason I care about this is not because bookmarks are the bane of my existence. It's because you demonstrate your harmful cheerleading by patting CCP on the back for barely doing anything in this area, as you literally do not know how little this improved. |
Pro TIps
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
22
|
Posted - 2014.09.11 06:58:00 -
[2] - Quote
Asayanami Dei wrote: You're full of ****. I've been copying bookmarks since 2009. It used to be 5 now it's 10, maybe you're doing something wrong. The interval between copy operations hasn't changed significantly for me, and it's short on my end. and time to propagate is slightly quicker on my end, there is a limit to it for a reason, read up on it (various threads from the time corp bookamrks were introduced). It's the first step on the road to alliance bookmarks so you should be happy about that not bitching.
I'm amazed that you took the time to post some nuance on this instead of continuing your cheerlead. That's what you need to do as CSM -- communicate with critical nuance. It's why people raged about what they perceived as your blanket support for Hyperion.
The fact is, the bookmark changes were minor and long-overdue, and are not enough. CCP said they will continue to adjust the limits upward if server resources permit, but so far, we haven't seen them indicate that they will or won't follow through on that.
I am dissatisfied with this improvement and I want you to ask CCP for more, not cheerlead. That's your role. |
Pro TIps
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
22
|
Posted - 2014.09.11 19:20:00 -
[3] - Quote
Incindir Mauser wrote:I think that the greater point to be made here is that W-space should be able to provide you with an income or economic incentives enough to allow you to not give two squirts of lemonade if you die in a T3 or a noobship with that head full of high-grade Slaves. That's a more extreme position than mine; but I would like more income. Currently I'm not playing in W-space because I've lost enough ISK since Hyperion that it just doesn't make sense to me. Did I make bad decisions leading to that ISK loss? No, it was all the result of frig fleets jumping through newly-spawned holes. What can be done to mitigate that risk? Just not run anom sites at all? Guess what, I'm not anymore. Content is lost. |
|
|
|